^V^
Is Fundamental play always go for long term hold ? u r wrong if u think so, long term hold is only applicable in bear mkt, for bull mkt esp at historical high, short n mid term play r most ideal strategy ^V^ Our bull run started since last Sep 06, based on past record, bull run can only last for 18 months+- ^V^( Take note: Bull run for Hangseng n STI started much earlier than us, in year 2005 if i am not mistaken ) hence, latest by 1st Q of 08, u wont be seeing me around in share mkt, that's for sure ^V^
If u doubt on my forecasting, try to hold yr existing stock till end of 08, see what will happen later ?
Of course i know my mom is female, D present high of BDI n steel price will not last forever, it will definitely slide down by 3rd or 4 qtr of 07, may i ask, is d coming 1 st QE n 2nd QE for Masteel n Swee Joo not falling under d high of BDI n steel price ? What i need is just two more good QE ^V^ that is ! who cares about d sustainability of BDI n steel price after that !?? ^V^ unless someone want to hold his Maybulk for long term , then u really need to worry about d sustainability..
Dont be mistaken, I rated Maybulk as trading buy , trading buy does not mean it wont goes up, it is still room for it to move up but percentage of return is not as great as value buy (@ 2.55 b4 bonus issued), pls get it right ^V^
Anonymous said...
thanks for the reply sam, that is entirely true, hard enough to find a counter with the criteria that you mentioned in the market, let alone in a bull market
however... there is still one problem with the debt XD...
by end of year 2005, Ranhill recorded a total debt of ~3bil RM, and by end of year 2006, it went up by a whopping ~1bil RM to around ~RM4bil.. surely this can be seen as a worrying sign?
now i know risk is essential in stock market, but at the very least it is important to investigate a counter, through and through before jumping to make a call? dont get me wrong, i follow your calls closely, making decent profit out of them (ranhill is just one of the counter that i bought upon seeing the movement), but i am still learning, and thus would ever be so grateful if you can enlighten me on this one.
thanks.
regards,
slowday
3 comments:
Uncle Sam
That survivor is a tai chek kong. I see him having run in with a few bloggers in tradebursa. Always claiming his superiority but never openly put a call at all.
same timer like this are negligible!!
there is one "tucows" whom he offended... tucows calls him a TICK (Kutu)!!
He is also a kutu here...
People like him... mo liew toh!!
Sam,
Mr We Survive is probably ranting coz he lost money in the share market.
We should ignore noise from a "tai chek kong" like him.
Always claim superiority but knows nuts.
I noticed that he has challenged you by ranting at tradebursa this afternoon.
Cannot even face up to you at your blog. Must go elsewhere and gossip.
Ignore that bugger.
Uncle Sam,
that tai chek kong is talking about you A LOT at trade bursa.
If Mr Survive got "fishballs", he should face you here and not be so "cocky" in another blog.
Always say he invest in China, my "football" lah!!!
Mr Survive.... I have something to tell you... Robert Kuok need not prove he is No 1 richest coz his shareholdings are public knowledge. Anyone who can count,(I believe they can & you can't) can tell you how much he is worth.
Mr Survive... you on the other hand is a small "KUTU"..nobody knows you...your assets are not public knowledge. So you must reveal your portfolio as proof like uncle sam.
So don't complain in another blog when you got no "fishball" to complain here.
And Mr Survive....I am not SAM....I am vvvt...so do not accuse me of being SAM.
thanks
vvvt
Post a Comment